Shakil, I've decided to do my testing against this - it's very dense and complicated so I think maybe better than those ontario docs. How are you progressings?
We want legal docs over here https://fay-informatics.emedialibrary.com/finder/find/index.html as a testing platform
Shakil is out till next week. I can help you test if needed
That's OK - we were goign to try to compare llama-index vs my custom approaches. I just wanted to have a consistent document between him and I. i would like to know what backends he's using for the vector searches he's doing also - see how much faster or slower they are compared to the ones I wrote. I will keep you posted on my RAG process!
CloudTranscodeManager was deleted, - I know we don't do the whole depracate thing - but how do I queue an autoTranslate now?
Hi Ian, we want to change the llama parameters to enable tools api. We are not sure if you have a special Docker process. We will figure out what we can unless you send us some guidance.
I think it's already enabled - but go ahead. check run-tf2.sh
I think the openai compatible endpoints are already there though
Caused by: org.openedit.OpenEditException: HTTP 501 {"error":{"code":501,"message":"This server does not support slots action. Start it with `--slot-save-path`","type":"not_supported_error"}}
I have to revert whatever you did - or at least re-enable -this is a must have feature for me
I have to revert whatever you did - or at least re-enable -this is a must have feature for me
that's from llama
2025-12-03 09:52:53 -0600 In Helper Mode. Ready for commands (e.g., 'search assets: [query]', 'summarize: [topic]').
I need you to search the GDPR locally for any info on the board of director rules
2025-12-03 09:58:35 -0600
Here’s what the GDPR text refers to as the “Board” in relation to governance of data protection, which is not the same as a private “board of directors.”What the Board is in GDPR (as seen in CELEX_32016R0679_EN_TXT.pdf)
The Board is the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), established as a Union body. It is led by the Chair and comprises the heads of the national supervisory authorities from each Member State plus the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).
Independence: Members act independently; the Board does not take instructions from others in performing its duties.
Composition: The Board is returned by its members, with representation from each Member State’s supervisory authority and the EDPS; if there are multiple authorities in a state, they appoint a joint representative.
Leadership (Articles 73-75):
The Board elects a Chair and two Deputy Chairs from among its members by simple majority.
The term of the Chair and Deputy Chairs is five years and renewable once.
The Secretariat supports day-to-day operations and tasks such as meetings, communications, translations, and publication of opinions/decisions.
The Board’s discussions are confidential where necessary.
Core responsibilities (Articles 70-71):
Ensure the consistent application of the GDPR across the Union.
Monitor and advise the European Commission on issues related to data protection in the Union.
Advise on the format and procedures for information exchange and, with the Commission, on binding corporate rules and other cross-border matters.
Issue guidelines, recommendations, and best practices; provide opinions on decisions by supervisory authorities; and help establish common procedures for reporting infringements.
Produce an annual report evaluating the practical application of guidelines and decisions.
Interaction with other bodies: The Board works with the European Commission and a committee under Article 93; it may request comments from interested parties and publish its guidance publicly.
Section 3 coverage: The material under European Data Protection Board (Section 3) reinforces the Board’s establishment, independence, composition, and tasks as described above (Articles 68–71).
Important clarification
There is no “board of directors” governance structure in GDPR. The term Board refers to the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and its governance, not to corporate boards. If you’re looking for guidance on a private organization’s board of directors, GDPR does not provide those rules; you would look to national corporate law or organizational governance policies instead.
Next steps (I can provide these on request)
I can pull the exact verbatim text for Articles 68–72 (and 70–71) to give you precise quotes.
I can search for additional GDPR sections that mention “Board” or related governance terms (e.g., Articles on consistency mechanism, guidelines, or independence) and summarize those.
If you have a specific use case (e.g., mapping to a compliance program, or aligning with a DCYF-style governance framework), I can tailor a concise policy-aligned summary of the relevant GDPR governance provisions.
CAn you tell me the line numbers you referenced for this?
Here are the line ranges from the CELEX document you received (CELEX_32016R0679_EN_TXT.pdf) that correspond to the points I referenced earlier:
Section and heading context for the GDPR Board (European Data Protection Board)
Section/Article header context: Section 3, European Data Protection Board and Article 68 show up around lines 1375–1383.
Exact heading for the Board text: around lines 1377–1383.
Board composition and representation
Composition (heads of national supervisory authorities + EDPS): lines 1385–1386.
Joint representative for states with multiple authorities: line 1386–1387.
Commission participation rights (participate without voting) and its designation: lines 1387–1389 (the two sentences appear in that nearby area).
Independence of the Board
Independence statement: lines 1391–1392 (and the follow-on independence language for paras 1–2 spans 1392–1396).
Tasks of the Board (FFPSA-like governance analog in GDPR context)
Article 70 (Tasks of the Board), including the general obligation to ensure consistent application and the main sub-areas (monitoring, advising on issues, format of information exchange, issuing guidelines, etc.): lines 1397–1414.
The subpoints (a)–(f) (and related items) span lines 1399–1414.
Reports by the Board
Article 71 (Reports): lines 1432–1437.
Secretariat and support (operational aspects)
Article 75 (Secretariat) and related duties: lines 1465–1478 (and nearby lines for specifics).
If you’d like, I can pull exact verbatim quotes for these line ranges or provide a more compact summary mapped to a policy-use case (e.g., how this maps to governance practices or cross-border data-protection coordination).
I need you to search the GDPR locally for any info on the board of director rules
2025-12-03 09:58:35 -0600
Here’s what the GDPR text refers to as the “Board” in relation to governance of data protection, which is not the same as a private “board of directors.”What the Board is in GDPR (as seen in CELEX_32016R0679_EN_TXT.pdf)
The Board is the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), established as a Union body. It is led by the Chair and comprises the heads of the national supervisory authorities from each Member State plus the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS).
Independence: Members act independently; the Board does not take instructions from others in performing its duties.
Composition: The Board is returned by its members, with representation from each Member State’s supervisory authority and the EDPS; if there are multiple authorities in a state, they appoint a joint representative.
Leadership (Articles 73-75):
The Board elects a Chair and two Deputy Chairs from among its members by simple majority.
The term of the Chair and Deputy Chairs is five years and renewable once.
The Secretariat supports day-to-day operations and tasks such as meetings, communications, translations, and publication of opinions/decisions.
The Board’s discussions are confidential where necessary.
Core responsibilities (Articles 70-71):
Ensure the consistent application of the GDPR across the Union.
Monitor and advise the European Commission on issues related to data protection in the Union.
Advise on the format and procedures for information exchange and, with the Commission, on binding corporate rules and other cross-border matters.
Issue guidelines, recommendations, and best practices; provide opinions on decisions by supervisory authorities; and help establish common procedures for reporting infringements.
Produce an annual report evaluating the practical application of guidelines and decisions.
Interaction with other bodies: The Board works with the European Commission and a committee under Article 93; it may request comments from interested parties and publish its guidance publicly.
Section 3 coverage: The material under European Data Protection Board (Section 3) reinforces the Board’s establishment, independence, composition, and tasks as described above (Articles 68–71).
Important clarification
There is no “board of directors” governance structure in GDPR. The term Board refers to the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and its governance, not to corporate boards. If you’re looking for guidance on a private organization’s board of directors, GDPR does not provide those rules; you would look to national corporate law or organizational governance policies instead.
Next steps (I can provide these on request)
I can pull the exact verbatim text for Articles 68–72 (and 70–71) to give you precise quotes.
I can search for additional GDPR sections that mention “Board” or related governance terms (e.g., Articles on consistency mechanism, guidelines, or independence) and summarize those.
If you have a specific use case (e.g., mapping to a compliance program, or aligning with a DCYF-style governance framework), I can tailor a concise policy-aligned summary of the relevant GDPR governance provisions.
CAn you tell me the line numbers you referenced for this?
Here are the line ranges from the CELEX document you received (CELEX_32016R0679_EN_TXT.pdf) that correspond to the points I referenced earlier:
Section and heading context for the GDPR Board (European Data Protection Board)
Section/Article header context: Section 3, European Data Protection Board and Article 68 show up around lines 1375–1383.
Exact heading for the Board text: around lines 1377–1383.
Board composition and representation
Composition (heads of national supervisory authorities + EDPS): lines 1385–1386.
Joint representative for states with multiple authorities: line 1386–1387.
Commission participation rights (participate without voting) and its designation: lines 1387–1389 (the two sentences appear in that nearby area).
Independence of the Board
Independence statement: lines 1391–1392 (and the follow-on independence language for paras 1–2 spans 1392–1396).
Tasks of the Board (FFPSA-like governance analog in GDPR context)
Article 70 (Tasks of the Board), including the general obligation to ensure consistent application and the main sub-areas (monitoring, advising on issues, format of information exchange, issuing guidelines, etc.): lines 1397–1414.
The subpoints (a)–(f) (and related items) span lines 1399–1414.
Reports by the Board
Article 71 (Reports): lines 1432–1437.
Secretariat and support (operational aspects)
Article 75 (Secretariat) and related duties: lines 1465–1478 (and nearby lines for specifics).
If you’d like, I can pull exact verbatim quotes for these line ranges or provide a more compact summary mapped to a policy-use case (e.g., how this maps to governance practices or cross-border data-protection coordination).
Could you compare this query: I need you to search the GDPR locally for any info on the board of director rules
It's working again - please treat that as a production docker instance, nota test instance
A large European holding company, EuroCorp (Controller, established in France), uses a cloud service provider, CloudHost (Processor, established in Germany), to store and process all of its customer data. CloudHost recently subcontracted its nightly data backup task to a specialist firm, BackupCo (Sub-Processor, established in India), which does not have an adequacy decision from the European Commission. EuroCorp's contract with CloudHost does not explicitly mention this sub-processing arrangement, but CloudHost included in its contract with BackupCo standard contractual clauses (SCCs) issued by the Commission. The Question: Under the GDPR, what legal transfer mechanism must EuroCorp ensure is in place, and what compliance requirement did CloudHost most likely violate by engaging BackupCo without informing EuroCorp? You must cite the relevant Article and line number(s) from the uploaded document. - you MUST use search documents
Shakil can you run this? Where are you testing
Shakil can you run this? Where are you testing
UN:
X Copyright Releases not assigning asset
How do I remove from a sub module table
X Drupal Sites - Usage History structure
Combine Entity and Folders
Look at attachments from previous version
Add thumbnail to "add existing Assets"
rerun Semantic category
Add button to process informatics
emedia
Fix lock button on asset
Email Add spam controls SMTP Server DMARK
OI - Make Title on a blog required
Setup embedding server on oi
Setup new Translation server on Vast.ai
X Copyright Releases not assigning asset
How do I remove from a sub module table
X Drupal Sites - Usage History structure
Combine Entity and Folders
Look at attachments from previous version
Add thumbnail to "add existing Assets"
rerun Semantic category
Add button to process informatics
emedia
Fix lock button on asset
Email Add spam controls SMTP Server DMARK
OI - Make Title on a blog required
Setup embedding server on oi
Setup new Translation server on Vast.ai
Also, we need to Add permissions to the Re-run AI Informatics
Q: Blog button on top of community not including emedia?
Bugs:
Move Email share and download into media tab
Fix email sending and siteroot for assets
AI
Add middleware laguage parser
Hardware. Backups. SMTP. Ubuntu
upgrade: UN, Babson, ALM, Alfred
SMTP, Local embedding serververs
Bugs:
Move Email share and download into media tab
Fix email sending and siteroot for assets
AI
Add middleware laguage parser
Hardware. Backups. SMTP. Ubuntu
upgrade: UN, Babson, ALM, Alfred
SMTP, Local embedding serververs
Sync old data that doesn't contain sourcetype: Assets from em9 are not being AI processed.
